> > Hi Folks,
> > if a software is updated and gets an big new number ---- 8.xxx What do you expect? In former times Sibelius always came up with IMPROVEMENTS.
>
> But they're not calling it Sibelius 8. Except when they are calling it Sibelius 8. It's 8. It's not 8. It's a silly word (and number) game that they're playing.
>
> In offline discussions with some users who don't use this forum, we're calling it "Sibelius 7.8", as a reminder that it's really only slightly different from 7.5, with a few new features that interest none of us, and pretty much the same bugs and design flaws, plus a few new bugs added. One of my friends pronounces "Sibelius 7.8" as "Sibelius seven pointless eight".
>
> The only big changes are not in the program itself, but rather in Avid's revenue-generating scheme.
>
> --
> Cause
"It's not Sibelius 8, but it is Sibelius 8."
Foolish game they play here...."don't pay attention to that man behind the curtain," "nothing to see here move along."
Sibelius 7.5.2 would be more apt in its definition.
--
Sibelius 6.2, 7.1.3, 7.5.1, Bob Zawalich plugins, NotePerformer 1.4.2c, dolet 6.4 (update 10-3-2014)
Finale 2010b,2011b,2012c, 2014d, TGTools pro, Patterson plugins, JW Plugins, GPO4, World Instruments
MuseScore 2 (seeing what's out there)
ProTools 9.5, Reaper
Notion 4, Notion 5 (bought but not installed), Progression, Progression 2, Progression 3
Windows XP Pro (32 bit); 2@ 7 Pro (64bit); 8.1 Pro (64 bit)/ 4-16GB Ram across four PC's
Pencil & Paper |